Tag Archives: cancer

Tamiflu Vaccine Linked to Convulsions, Delirium and Bizarre Deaths

Tamiflu Vaccine Linked With Convulsions, Delirium and Bizarre Deaths

From: Natural News:

An FDA advisory panel has recommended stronger warnings on two influenza drugs after reviewing evidence linking them to neurological and psychiatric problems that have led to deaths in some cases.

The current warning on Roche Laboratories’ Tamiflu (generic name oseltamivir) urges close monitoring of flu patients, particularly children, for “increased risk of self injury and confusion shortly after taking Tamiflu.” The panel recommended that this warning be strengthened to say that “in some cases, these behaviors resulted in serious injuries, including death, in adult and pediatric patients.”

The label of Glaxo SmithKline’s Relenza (generic name zanamivir), the panel said, should be strengthened to mention “reports of hallucinations, delirium and abnormal behavior.” The panel said that both labels should mention that some flu patients not taking the drugs have also experienced such symptoms.

To read more:
Tamiflu Vaccine Linked With Convulsions, Delirium and Bizarre Deaths

Related reading:

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1

Vaccination must read  – this link contains many more excellent links….

Lead developer of HPV vaccine comes clean

Vaxxed the documentary 

Mercury causing dementia and Alzheimers in 40 year olds!

Comments I copied over from old website:

Debbie Kendall Says:
March 30th at 12:13 pm
I was given Tamiflu after trying to make an appointment with my GP at Ringwood Medical Centre, with what I thought was infection, ie:closed up throat, and a temperature of 39 degrees. I was prescribed over the phone despite insisting I had not had anything like flu symptoms, just a bad headache and back pain the day before. On taking Tamiflu, I immediately got very vivid dream state while I was awake. The next morning my entire spine had swelled up and when I moved it felt like all my spinal nerves had stuck together. I Then lost feeling all over my back, all while having massive heart palpitations, burning feet and feeling very scared. My husband spent hours trying to phone the heart doctor at Bournemouth Hospital, but just got brushed off and no one phoned back. The same at the GP, although they did eventually phone back and told me not to take anymore. But it was now day 4 and I only had one tablet left. I had lost control of my bowels and muscles in my bottom would not work. I have eventually regained most of the feeling in my back and my bowel control and muscles, but have a large numb patch over my back. It has been 9 months. I had no acknowledgement or any explanation or any investigation. I was totally ignored by everyone in the NHS. Recently I was offered the swine flu vaccination.. What do you think I said?

 Organic Gardening Tips Says: September 5th at 8:01 am
Heya, I was reading a different issue about this on one more blog a couple of minutes ago only. Interesting perspective you’ve compared to the other 1 I read earlier but hey, it’s your opinion in any case. – And I’m leaning more in direction of yours, lol. =))

6 Outdoor Dog Beds Says:
June 2nd at 8:43 am
Very nice article. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your website articles. In any case I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 6

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn’t get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can’t. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I’m not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

A: The operative word is “appear.” What about all the children who can’t focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don’t get shots.

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person’s responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1


Vaxxed the documentary

Robert de Niro says son changed overnight after MMR jab

Robert Kennedy on the Vaccine Autism Coverup

Dr. Halvorsen on Wakefield and Vaccine Safety

Vaccination must read – this link includes many more links! 

From Dr Viera Scheibners Shaken Baby Syndrome: The Vaccination Link. Published in Nexus Magazine.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 5

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

A: Yes. But after this interview, I’ll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.
Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I’m saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don’t get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe. In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings. They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 4

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

Q: The things that are not there.

A: Yes.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I’d like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn’t get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what’s called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair’s wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his “personal and family life.” In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.  Editors note – fast forward a couple of decades give or take and vaccine damage is in the limelight more and more. Actors like Robert de Niro, Jim Carrey, Jenny McCarthy, Alicia Silverstone to name but a few are keeping vaccinations in the limelight, opening up peoples minds little by little. More and more parents are stepping forward. So the pHARMaceutical cartel step in and show how scared they are and try and bring in mandatory vaccinations. Fuck that. I’d move anywhere to avoid vaccinations! 

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don’t need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers — a few — might start leaking information.

Q: A good idea.

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 5

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 3

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

A: First of all, there is no “if.” They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn’t. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you’ve said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network. Editors note – proper research still isn’t being done, in fact, its worse than ever in some parts of the world – like California, the golden state, the health crazed state, now has mandatory vaccinations – even for adults. disgusting. The only way round it is to home school or not work in health care/schools! Exemptions are being phased out and kids can’t go to school if not vaccinated! How harsh is that 🙁 

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

Q: This network you speak of.

A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles — is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from “unknown causes,” and that’s why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital. Editors note – Dr Wakefield is now back in the limelight with Vaxxed the documentary.

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 4

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 2

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I’m concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases — say, meningitis — that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.
Q: So you’re saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That’s exactly what I’m saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

A: Well yes, that happened. But that’s not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I’m talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors — that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don’t know are in those kidneys.

A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It’s discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

A: Yes I did.

Q: What happened?

A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with “guilt by association.” All in all, though, I behaved myself. I made sure I didn’t create problems for myself.

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 3

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 1

Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years and is the author of three explosive collections – THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX. HIS WEBSITE: No more fake news

Just Say NO – John Rappoports Interview with Ex-Vaccine Researcher to follow… (must be a decade or so old?? But still really really good…..I hope no one minds me sharing the interview in full here. Message me if you do 🙂

At the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system… often leading to dependency on some form of pHARMaceutical. Remember, it’s the health CARE system, not the health CURE system. Ill people = customers and more profits to the medical mafia.

I love this interview between John Rappoport and an ex-vaccine researcher. The ex researcher does not want to reveal which vaccines he worked with, as he doesn’t not want to be harassed by the FBI or even the IRS if his identity is revealed. He knows a few people to whom this has happened. A compelling read that makes sense on every level.

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

Jon Rappaport interviews an ex-vaccine worker
“Dr Mark Randall”.

Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won’t say which ones.

Q: Why not?

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

Q: On what grounds?

A: The grounds don’t matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

Q: Harassed by whom?

A: The FBI.

Q: Really?

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

Q: So much for free speech.

A: I was “part of the inner circle.” If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall “brilliance” of modern medicine.

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It’s one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don’t contract the diseases as easily.

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

Disclaimer: Any information obtained here is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone.

John Rappoport Interviews ex-vaccine researcher, Part 2

A still birth, a cesarean and a HWBA2C – part V

Many wounds were healed within me as I held Inky in my arms, I didn’t sleep that first night in hospital after she was born. I was soooo elated. I finally knew and FELT the meaning of the expression ‘I felt like all my Christmases had come at once.’ I stayed a further night in hospital because of my c-section, and again, I could hardly sleep because I had that excited feeling in my tummy like when your’e a kid and you just can’t sleep because something really exciting is going to happen. Though I had one of those cots that attach to the hospital bed, my girly still ended up snuggled right up next to me and I couldn’t get enough of looking at her face when she was asleep. I knew I should try and sleep but that’s impossible when the best thing ever has happened to you and you’re floating on cloud 9…. I was worried when the midwife came to see me on her rounds, she would tell me off, as according to ‘official’ advice co-sleeping is so unsafe (yeah right). However, when she did stop by I was already apologising for having my baby in bed with me, she actually ENCOURAGED me to co-sleep and said it was the safest and best place for a baby to be! Nuff said.

My mums boyfriend actually paid for me to stay in a private room at my request. I wanted these moments all to myself, not interrupted by the cries of other babies, lol. Nor didn’t I want to potentially witness anyone who had had a baby and was unhappy. Believe me, I’ve met a few people like that in my life, and it breaks my heart. If women who didn’t appreciate/love/want their babies / saw them as an inconvenience, actually knew the heart ache of still birth they may perhaps appreciate and SEE the miracle a baby is.

I was released pout of hospital after 2 nights and I felt so proud leaving hospital with my girly, her first car ride. My Mum picked us up. I was so elated to be going home with my live, healthy baby. It was like teh most amazing dream come true. Ever. On top of that, I was somewhat surprised and happy that I hardly felt any pain from surgery at all. I didn’t even have to take co-deine like last time with J. Just 6 days of paracetamol instead of the recommended 10. I didn’t even have morphine like last time with J. The natural high, the baby moon, the endorphin’s coursing through me were my medicine. My gorgeous, perfect daughter cleansed my soul and restored my heart and my faith that amazing things could still happen to me. I breastfed my little girly for years and co-slept with her. I never thought I’d ever have another baby. I didn’t ever want to risk it again. I couldn’t deal with losing another baby now that I knew what it felt like to love my own living flesh and blood. I thought I’d always be content with it being just Inky and I forever… But then I didn’t know that I would fall in love with THE best man in the world when Inky was 5, and that we would actually have another baby…. nearly 3 years later, when Inky was 8….

A still birth, a cesarean and a HWBA2C – PART 1

A still birth, a cesarean and a HWBA2C part IV

I can’t fault the NHS with the care I had during and after my 2nd pregnancy, but I DIDNT WANT IT. I just done it because I was scared. I felt powerless and like I had no control over what was being done to my body. Like I had to listen to the system that was responsible for damaging my soul and killing my first born in the first place. However, like I said I cant fault the care and attention I received with my second pregnancy. I have to add that it felt surreal feeling paralyzed from the waist down during the c-section, yet feeling  things going on. I must confess that I was so nervous about the cesarean that when I glanced over my shoulder and they were coming at me from behind with this big fat needle when I was sat on the operating table, legs dangling down, that I actually jumped straight off it and said ‘F*** this I’m going home’, but my Mum managed to calm me. I hadn’t slept the night before, I was petrified of something going wrong and this baby dying too. I was also super duper hungry (not allowed to eat before surgery – apparently its unusual for anyone to be hungry whilst being operated on, but I kept saying I was hungry lol). My mind was racing and I was physically shaking. She told me to think about my Grandad, whom I had loved so much and who had passed away exactly 3 weeks ago, and my beloved Maxi horse and J… I actually found inner peace from somewhere and calmed right down as I looked in to my Mums eyes. Then I just let it all happen to me. I even had my own playlist of songs.  Before I had the c-section I asked a friend who had had one as well how it felt – she likened it to the feeling of someone rummaging around in your handbag whilst its still hung on your shoulder. Spot on. At one point I remember hearing something like the sound of scissors cutting through my abdomen and even said jokingly that it sounded like scissors – they are scissors I was told. I remember my Mum suddenly shouting kind of excitedly that she could see my insides! ‘So you love me inside out now Mum’ I said jokingly. When they lifted my baby out I remember Mum tearfully announcing that the baby was a girl… WOW.  When Mum passed her to me, I was overjoyed to finally hold my beautiful girl and look at her sweet, gorgeous, animated, alive face. It took me a while to get her latched on to my breast for her first ever feed – looking back I’m sure it was because of all the drugs pumping around my system that had passed in to her…. my 6lbs 7oz little wonder girl. My constant companion for the last 38 weeks 🙂 The little person I already knew so well and whos life was so precious to me   ♥

A still birth, a cesarean and a HWBA2C part V

A still birth, a cesarean and a HWBA2C – back to part 1

Harmful Parabens, Carcinogens and Preservatives in Baby Products

Not just baby products, also products aimed at adults… We MUST Protect Babies – and ourselves – from dangerous ingredients in every day skin care products…..

Shortly after birth mums start the regular routine of lovingly washing their babies brand new skin, with a wide range of baby products including shampoo, soap, shower gels, body lotions and talcum powder. Sometimes several times a day.

BUT – how would you as a parent – or relative for that matter – react when/if you found out that these products are often a nasty concoction of dangerous ingredients? You would go mad is probably the best answer!

The most disturbing of these ingredients can be categorised in to 3 groups. Their use is wide-spread. They are known as hidden carcinogens. These are ingredients that are contaminated with carcinogens, or which break down to give off carcinogens. Infants are about 100 times more sensitive to these than adults.

The biggest group of hidden carcinogens includes dozens of detergents or wetting agents, especially LAURETHS, PEGs and CETEARETHS. These are all polluted with the potent and easily released carcinogens ethylene oxide and dioxane. LANOLIN (also known as woodwax ester, wool alcohol, adeps lanae, aloholes lanae, lanolin hydrous, lanolin anhydrous, wool fat, wool wax, wool grease, glossylan, golden dawn, nodorian, sparklelan) is derived from sheep’s wool and another HIDDEN CARCINOGEN- most samples of this are POLLUTED WITH DDT like PESTICIDES. The sad thing is that these carcinogens could easily be removed during manufacture – if the effort was made!

The second group includes TRIETHANOLAMINE (TEA) which is also a detergent. Following interactions with NITRITE this produces a HIGHLY POTENT NITROSAMINE CARCINOGEN. TEA is listed under Schedule 3, part B of the Chemical Weapons Convention as it can be used in the manufacture nitrogen mustards.

The 3rd group includes DIAZOLIDINYL and QUATERNIUMS UREA PRESERVATIVES that break down either in the product or when in contact with the skin releasing the CARCINOGEN FORMALDEHYDE. DIAZOLIDINYL is also known as * Germall II * Diazolidinylurea * Urea N-(1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,5-dioxo-4-imidazolidinyl)-N,N’-bis(hydroxymethyl)

Another group to be concerned about is a widely used group of PRESERVATIVES known as PARABENS. Many studies have been conducted in the last 10 years proving them weakly estrogenic. They bring about ABNORMAL HORMONAL EFFECTS after being put on the skins of infant rodents, particularly males. TESTOSTERONE LEVELS were decreased as well as UROGENITAL ABNORMALITIES. Parabens have also been found to AMASS in the breasts of women with BREAST CANCER. Widely used parabens include methylparaben (E number E218), ethylparaben (E214), propylparaben (E216) and butylparaben. Less used parabens include isobutylparaben, isopropylparaben, benzylparaben and their sodium salts.

TALCUM POWDER is still used widely in spite of CANCER WARNINGS – based on rodent testing this can CAUSE LUNG CANCER. Also the INHALATION of TALCUM POWDER can cause ACUTE OR CHRONIC LUNG IRRITATION and DISEASE (TALCOSIS), OVARIAN CANCER, SKIN CANCER, even DEATH. In 1993, a US National Toxicology Program report found that cosmetic grade talc caused tumours in animals

FRAGRANCES which have many ingredients are often used in baby products – but only for the parents benefit! The downside is that more than 25 of these are KNOWN TO CAUSE ALLERGIC DERMATITIS.

Another widely used ingredient of HIGH concern is SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE (also known as SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE * DODECYL SODIUM SULFATE * STEOL -130, 230, 270, 330, 370 or 460 * STEPANOL * ALKYL ETHER SULFATE * SODIUM POE(2) LAURYL ETHER SULFATE * SODIUM DIETHYLENE GLYCOL LAURYL ETHER SULFATE * SODIUM LAURYL ETHER SULFATE. NOTE: they WILL try and trick you into buying their products with these DANGEROUS INGREDIENTS under different names!!!). Just one application to the skin of human adults has proven to DAMAGE the skins microscopic structure, amplifying the penetration of CARCINOGENIC or other TOXIC INGREDIENTS.

Products containing the above mentioned ingredients in the last paragraph, can affect those prone to eczema and other irritants. These substances give the product a foaming quality, allowing for better distribution of the product while washing hair or body, and whilst brushing teeth. Once rinsed off, the product will have cleaned the area but will have taken moisture from the top layers of skin. In people with sensitive e.g. prone to acne, psoriasis, dermatitis, eczema and chemical sensitivity, the drying property of this kind of detergent can cause flare-ups of skin conditions or may worsen existing conditions. Believe it or not these are also found in the popular brands of snack foods. And also in ORGANIC PRODUCTS. Just because something is organic, does not make it safe. ALWAYS CHECK INGREDIENTS BEFORE PURCHASING. EDUCATE YORUSELVES – FOR KNOWLEDGE PROTECTS AND IGNORANCE ENDANGERS.

The most worrisome fact is that there are readily available alternatives for these highly toxic and dangerous ingredients out there! Why have the multi-billion cosmetic and toiletry industry not done anything to counter this? Easy – the main priority of the industrys trade association is to ‘protect the freedom of the industry to compete in a fair market place’. At the same time an extremely aggressive agenda is followed against what is claimed as being ‘unreasonable or unnecessary labelling or warning requirements. Once again we can see here – profits are FAR more important to these people than their fellow humans health.